Stay tuned to our new posts and updates! Click to join us on WhatsApp L&C-Whatsapp & Telegram telegram Channel
ISSN 2231 - 699X | A Publication on Cinema & Allied Art Forms
 
 
Support LnC-Silhouette. Great reading for everyone, supported by readers. SUPPORT
L&C-Silhouette Subscribe
The L&C-Silhouette Basket
L&C-Silhouette Basket
A hand-picked basket of cherries from the world of most talked about books and popular posts on creative literature, reviews and interviews, movies and music, critiques and retrospectives ...
to enjoy, ponder, wonder & relish!

Raj Kapoor and the Male Gaze

January 11, 2025 | By

Raj Kapoor’s portrayal of women in his films evolved from respectfully depicting Nargis to later adopting a more sexualized ‘male gaze’ approach after Nargis’s departure, writes Shoma A Chatterji

Raj Kapoor

Raj Kapoor

Raj Kapoor stepped into the world of cinema as producer, director and actor with Aag (1948). He was 24 when he founded RK Films. At that time, the concept of ‘male gaze’ did not exist.

‘Male gaze’ is a term coined by Laura Mulvey in her seminal work, Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema, published in Screen in 1975. According to Mulvey,  a viewing of a series of feature films made by male directors and their technical crew, also composed mainly of men, would reveal that women characters within the films are designed to cater to male sexual desires. The camera is transformed into a voyeur, essentially male, that focuses on the woman’s body in a way that becomes a source for the visual pleasure of men.

When we look back at the films of Raj Kapoor, we not only see the replication of the Laura Mulvey theory in his earlier films, but we discover the evolution of Kapoor as a producer-director in his use of the ‘male gaze’ for the female characters in his films.

In the sixteen films that Kapoor and Nargis worked together as an on-screen couple, there was a magic chemistry that lit up the screen almost every time. Juxtaposed against the tramp-like wanderer that Kapoor is in most of these films, Nargis, whether playing a trained and practising lawyer in Awara, or the rustic beauty in Barsaat, was portrayed with dignity.

Kapoor’s character in Shree 420 represents the common man lost in a world dominated by the rich and famous. This role, in an amazingly dizzy combination of comedy and drama, is unforgettable. Vidya, the young woman he falls in love with, is presented as the epitome of Indian female goodness, inner beauty, and purity. Memorable is the scene when Vidya visits the casino along with Raj and is publicly humiliated by Maya (Nadira). She begins to cry quietly, while Raj remains silent. It is a wonderful scene, brilliantly acted and executed.

Shree 420

Nadira, Raj Kapoor and Nargis in Shree 420. Standing beside Raj Kapoor is music director Jaikishan

There was absolutely no attempt to use the cinematic presence of Nargis as a titillating object of sensuality to whet the sexual appetites of a male audience. Her last appearance in an RK film was a very brief cameo in Jagte Raho in which she offers some drinking water to a very thirsty Kapoor who has spent an eventful night looking for some water to drink.

Jagte Raho

She offers some drinking water to a very thirsty Kapoor (Jagte Raho)

Nargis’s entire screen image was carefully designed by Kapoor himself. He styled her look from his personal perception of what defined a beautiful woman. Her hair is mostly short, framing her slightly long face, captured beautifully on camera that gives it a touch of the surreal. In the first part of Mera Naam Joker, we see a younger version of the Joker having a crush on one of his teachers (Simi), who always wore white. This formed the basic model not only of Nargis’ screen image in RK films but also the public image of Raj Kapoor’s wife Krishna who was always draped in white sari and white blouse, decent, reticent and dignified.

Nargis in all Raj Kapoor films was seen as pristine, highlighted as a beautiful woman through clever backlighting by his cinematographer. With few exceptions, she represented a visual purity. This posed a striking contrast with the Chaplinesque image of the ‘vagabond’ hero which is the English translation of the word ‘awara’. In the long dream sequence in Awara, however, we find Nargis and Raj Kapoor both wearing Western costumes of glamour and glitter. The posters show her in larger images than the image of Raj Kapoor.

Awara 1951

Awara poster – Nargis’s image is larger than that of Raj Kapoor (Pic: SMM Ausaja Archives)

According to Mulvey, visual media reduces female characters with virtues and aspirations into mere ‘objects’ of aesthetic value.

Once Nargis walked out of Raj Kapoor’s films and life, Kapoor changed the leading lady images in his films featuring other heroines like Padmini (Jis Desh Mein Ganga Behti Hai), directed by his cameraman Radhu Karmakar, Vyjayantimala (Sangam), Zeenat Aman (Satyam Shivam Sundaram), Padmini Kolhapure (Prem Rog), Mandakini (Ram Teri Ganga Maili) Dimple Kapadia (Bobby) and Zeba Bakhtiar (Henna). His scripts gave the leading female characters a lot of flesh in terms of the roles, but much more in terms of using them brazenly as titillating objects of cinema.  Most of the time, these women were shown as helpless victims of a patriarchal society. In terms of their cinematic presence, they were merrily turned into ‘objects’ of display and titillation. In other words, one may conclude that Raj Kapoor’s vision of his celluloid woman changed dramatically after Nargis stepped out of the RK camp. It fits more and more into Laura Mulvey’s theory of the male gaze through his later films.

Raj Kapoor’s sudden shift in his cinematic perspective of women was roundly criticized by other filmmakers and admirers though audience tastes had changed radically over time. Special mention must be made about how Padmini was presented as a voluptuous woman in Jis Desh Mein Ganga Behti Hai with more body than mind or spirit. This phase continued to dominate the leading ladies of his films. Consider the image of Vyjayantimala in Sangam where she does wear the sari very gracefully but when the newly married pair travel abroad, we see her in a skin-tight costume singing and dancing to the seductive number ‘Main kaa karuun Ram mujhe buddha mil gaya.

Kapoor did not make the women in Mera Naam Joker the object of a voyeuristic camera probably because it was a semi-autobiographical film said to be inspired by Charlie Chaplin’s Limelight.

In Satyam Shivam Sundaram, though Roopa (Zeenat Aman) covers half her face with her ghunghat as it is scarred, the rest of her body is turned into an ‘object’ of the camera, her ghagra sometimes reaching up to her thighs, a lot of her cleavage visible above her short choli.

Satyam Shivam Sundaram

Shashi Kapoor and Zeenat Aman in Satyam Shivam Sundaram

In Bobby and Prem Rog, where Rishi Kapoor played the male lead, Raj Kapoor took great care to focus on social evils such as the caste-class divide and widow remarriage respectively but did not present the leading ladies as ‘bodies’ than as ‘minds.’ Was it because the father in Raj Kapoor took precedence over the actor-producer, who did not want to expose his son to the body of a young woman?

Probably not, since his youngest son was the hero in Ram Teri Ganga Maili where Kapoor was roundly criticized for having shot Mandakini draped in a white sari without a blouse bathing under a waterfall.

Nargis, through her screen image in RK films, drew a bold line of difference when she left the RK fold.  The other leading ladies who walked in, represented  women as the ‘object; where the hero’s ultimate role was to ‘rescue’ these damsels in distress.

 

Click Raj Kapoor@100

for Critiques, Reviews, Interviews

— The Centenary Tribute Series

 

 

Raj Kapoor Centenary Special

 

Creative Writing

Whether you are new or veteran, you are important. Please contribute with your articles on cinema, we are looking forward for an association. Send your writings to amitava@silhouette-magazine.com

Dr. Shoma A Chatterji is a freelance journalist, film scholar and author based in Kolkata. Her focus of interest lies in Indian cinema, human rights, media, gender and child rights. She has authored 24 books mainly on Indian cinema and on gender and has been jury at several film festivals in India and abroad. She has won two National Awards - for Best Film Critic in 1991 and for Best Book on cinema in 2002. She has also won four fellowships over the past 10 years.
All Posts of Shoma A Chatterji

Hope you enjoyed reading…

… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading and supporting our creative, informative and analytical posts than ever before. And yes, we are firmly set on the path we chose when we started… our twin magazines Learning and Creativity and Silhouette Magazine (LnC-Silhouette) will be accessible to all, across the world.

We are editorially independent, not funded, supported or influenced by investors or agencies. We try to keep our content easily readable in an undisturbed interface, not swamped by advertisements and pop-ups. Our mission is to provide a platform you can call your own creative outlet and everyone from renowned authors and critics to budding bloggers, artists, teen writers and kids love to build their own space here and share with the world.

When readers like you contribute, big or small, it goes directly into funding our initiative. Your support helps us to keep striving towards making our content better. And yes, we need to build on this year after year. Support LnC-Silhouette with a little amount – and it only takes a minute. Thank you

Support LnC-Silhouette

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Silhouette Magazine publishes articles, reviews, critiques and interviews and other cinema-related works, artworks, photographs and other publishable material contributed by writers and critics as a friendly gesture. The opinions shared by the writers and critics are their personal opinion and does not reflect the opinion of Silhouette Magazine. Images on Silhouette Magazine are posted for the sole purpose of academic interest and to illuminate the text. The images and screen shots are the copyright of their original owners. Silhouette Magazine strives to provide attribution wherever possible. Images used in the posts have been procured from the contributors themselves, public forums, social networking sites, publicity releases, YouTube, Pixabay and Creative Commons. Please inform us if any of the images used here are copyrighted, we will pull those images down.