Stay tuned to our new posts and updates! Click to join us on WhatsApp L&C-Whatsapp & Telegram telegram Channel
ISSN 2231 - 699X | A Publication on Cinema & Allied Art Forms
 
 
Support LnC-Silhouette. Great reading for everyone, supported by readers. SUPPORT
L&C-Silhouette Subscribe
The L&C-Silhouette Basket
L&C-Silhouette Basket
A hand-picked basket of cherries from the world of most talked about books and popular posts on creative literature, reviews and interviews, movies and music, critiques and retrospectives ...
to enjoy, ponder, wonder & relish!

The Healing Touch: Doctors in Tapan Sinha’s Films

October 27, 2024 | By

In Tapan Sinha’s rich and impressive oeuvre, there are four films that have doctors as central characters. Each of these films projects unique aspects of the medical profession. Subha Das Mollick explores the motivations that drive the doctors in these four films.

Soumitra Chatterjee in Wheel Chair

Soumitra Chatterjee in Wheel Chair (Source – Sukumar Roy)

In Tapan Sinha’s long career spanning half a century and nearly 50 films, he handled many contemporary social issues with depth and conviction, leaving a deep and lasting impression in viewers’ minds. His films are like true mirrors of our society that hold up reality without any sugarcoating or veneer of glamour. In his rich and impressive oeuvre, there are four films that have doctors as central characters. Each of these films projects unique aspects of the medical profession. The motivations that drive the doctors in these four films are triggered by events in their personal life but soon enough, they take on a larger social dimension. The doctor becomes a pivotal figure in his society. Together, the films project the changing scenario of the medical profession in our country over three decades.

In Khaniker Atithi (1959), we find the doctor (Nirmal Kumar) in charge of a village hospital. This is not a punishment posting or a mandatory stint to serve rural India. The doctor is here by choice, to bury his past and start a new life. The well-being of this village in Bengal rests on his slender shoulders. His days and nights are taken up in providing care to the village people.

Nirmal Kumar as The doctor in Khaniker Atithi

His days and nights are taken up in providing care to the village people.

The village hospital has the basic facilities needed to take care of the eclectic bunch of patients as well as the OPD patients who come for a check-up. In 1959, a village hospital like this would be something for India to be proud of – although nowhere in the film is it projected as an exemplary hospital. Indeed, the hospital is projected as the least one can expect. The doctor is often slightly ashamed of the limited facilities.

Each inmate of this hospital has his own story, his unique idiosyncrasies that make the nearly two-hour-long tapestry of the narrative rich and colourful. The sub-plots are cleverly interwoven with the primary plot and are given as much importance as the story of the protagonist.

One day, his past arrives at his doorstep like a southern breeze, bringing in its wake a pleasant freshness, a feminine order in his harsh, disorderly masculine lifestyle. It also brings a fresh medical challenge to his already overburdened life. Meeta’s five-year-old son cannot walk. The doctors in Calcutta have given up, but the mother hasn’t. At the bottom of her heart, she knows that her erstwhile love, who once had a brilliant career at Calcutta Medical College, would have the solution to her problem. Hence, she tracks him down to his humble hospital in a godforsaken village in Bengal. She comes carrying her crippled son in her arms and surrenders to him. He takes up the challenge.

Ruma Guhathakurta and Nirmal Kumar in Khaniker Atithi

He takes up the challenge

The challenges are two-fold – one, an emotional challenge due to the unexpected resurfacing of his past; two, the medical challenge of curing the little boy. The medical challenge has been foregrounded in the film. Will he be able to cure the little boy? Will this little boy be able to stand on his two feet and walk? Thus, the narrative moves forward.

The doctor is Meeta’s last hope. She is now a widow with practically no support system to fall back on. Sinha appraises his viewers of their back story through flashback sequences. They do not discuss their past at all. They lie awake at night in adjacent rooms, with the connecting door closed tight and remember their happy past, full of hopes for a happy life together. Meeta’s uncle plays the spoiler by saying that he had promised Meeta’s mother on her deathbed that he would get her daughter married to someone from the same caste. The doctor stoically accepts this dictum and moves out of Meeta’s life. Meeta gets married to an engineer with a promising career and settles down in her conjugal life. However, fate has other things in store. Her husband dies in an accident. The uncle invites his widowed niece and her infant son to come to Burma with him. But she declines, saying that her mission in life now is to raise her son and she can only fulfil this responsibility in Calcutta.

Khaniker Atithi Ruma Guhathakurta and Chhabi Biswas

She declines, saying that her mission in life now is to raise her son

In the flashback sequences, framed photographs recur as leitmotifs. In Meeta’s flashback, it is the framed photo of her infant son before the fall that injured his leg. In the doctor’s flashback is a framed photo of the entrance to Calcutta Medical College. This is his alma mater, the institute that gave him his identity as a doctor. It is this institute he re-enters, with a hope for a solution to the medical problem. And sure enough, his erstwhile professor comes to his help. He correctly diagnoses the little boy’s problem, operates on him and rectifies the fault in his hip bone.

Back in the village, little Babu eventually stands on his two feet and takes the first steps forward when he sees the other boys of his age running around and playing hide and seek. They all hide behind trees and repeatedly call out his name. In response, little Babu makes a huge effort and stands up. It is a triumph of medical science and a triumph of human will as well.

Khaniker Atithi

It is a triumph of medical science and a triumph of human will

Interestingly, in this film, Sinha endows all his characters with agency. They all make conscious decisions – whether it is the patient with a golden voice, the ex-serviceman who plays the mouth organ or the drunkard who often escapes from his hospital bed for his ‘elixir’. Even Babu can eventually stand up because he wills himself to do so as the doctor stands in hiding and watches.

How does Khaniker Atithi end? Does it have a fairytale ‘and they lived happily ever after’ ending? No. The film ends the way it had begun. In the opening shots of the film, we see a bus winding along the dusty village road and dropping Meeta off in the village. In the closing shot, the bus takes her and her son back to the city. As she bids goodbye, Meeta vows to raise her son to be a good human being. That is her priority in life. The priority in the doctor’s life is to look after the health and well-being of his village folk. So, he stays back, instead of accompanying Meeta to the city.

Thus, Khaniker Atithi proves to be a film on nation-building as well as a feminist film. The woman does not need a man as her life partner. She is confident that she will be able to raise her son as a single mother. The man has set his priorities in life. He does not deviate from these priorities for a woman. The film could as well have been named ‘Triumph of Will’.

Tapan directing Vyajantimala in Hatey Bazarey

Tapan Sinha directing Vyajantimala in Hatey Bazarey

Hatey Bazarey (1967) also unfolds against a rural backdrop. But this time the rural setting is a small township just outside Bengal. The film is based on a story by the Bengali writer Bonophul who was also a doctor, with a degree from Calcutta Medical College. Hatey Bazarey was a super hit film and won several prestigious awards, including the National Award for Best Feature Film. It remains a timeless classic in the canons of Bengali cinema, deeply entrenched in the minds of the viewers who watched it almost 60 years ago.

Sinha uses the doctor’s story to tell a classic tale of good vs. evil. The film opens with the shots of the villain – a lustful predator on the prowl, the spoilt brat of a rich businessman, who has scant regard for the law of the land. Soon we meet the hero, a genteel, civilized doctor, being driven along the countryside by his loyal driver. He is the civil surgeon at the local hospital, in whose hands lies the well-being of his community. The doctor is equally attentive to the lowly chamaar woman and the wife of a well-to-do businessman who suffers from manic depression. In 1967, the medical profession had not yet become hi-tech and exploitative. Doctors had to master the art of diagnosis and could achieve a lot with minimal infrastructure. Their fundamentals were clear. They acquired their healing touch through hard work and careful study of the science of medicine.

Film booklet cover of Haate Bazare (Source - Sounak Gupta)

Film booklet cover of Hatey Bazarey (Source – Sounak Gupta)

In Hatey Bazarey, Dr Anadi Mukherjee’s (Ashok Kumar) prescriptions are simple – go for a long walk and fill your lungs with fresh air, have your meals on time, and follow basic hygiene. He has a clear vision about the extent and limitations of medical science. When his patients ask him whether they will recover or not, his typical answer is, “I do not know.” He knows that he can only try to the best of his ability. He is no God. He cannot save an old woman in the bustee from dying a lonely death or his wife who suffers from a chronic heart ailment.

Meanwhile, the villain is on the prowl. His one aim in life is to seduce Chhipli (Vaijayantimala), a young and attractive widow, who makes a living by selling vegetables. When Chhipli spurns his amorous offer, Lachhman (Ajitesh Bandopadhyay) tries to frame her half-brother on charges of theft and has him arrested. The doctor gets him released. Gradually, the doctor becomes the caregiver of his community, attending not only to their physical well-being but also helping to resolve family feuds and other troubles.

The good doctor comes face to face with Lachhman at a party thrown by latter’s father. Lachhman is drunk and he opens his heart to the doctor. He says, “I have come to enjoy the world, not make sacrifices. The world will cease to live if everybody becomes a saint.”

Interestingly, some of the profound truths of life are uttered by Lachhman. On the night the old woman dies, Lachhman comes to the bustee looking for Chhipli. There he finds the doctor, jumps to conclusions and says, “You, Doctor! Why don’t you accept it? I am there in you. I am a part of you. Why do you pretend to be a saint?”

Tapan Sinha with Ashok Kumar and Ali Akbar Khan

The title, Hatey Bazarey, attains its true meaning when the doctor, after his wife’s death, resigns from his post of civil surgeon and decides to become a barefoot people’s doctor. He converts a van into a dispensary cum operation theatre and parks it at the edge of the marketplace. He gets help from all his loyal friends and employees. Chhipli too comes around to help and quickly becomes his able assistant. Lachhman warns Chhipli, “Your destiny is with me – call me your doom or your ultimate pleasure. I am the villain in this narrative of good deeds.”

The climactic clash between good and evil happens on the night of the festival when the whole village is swaying to the tune of a folk song.  Lacchman tricks Chhipli into a tryst and attempts to rape her. Dr Mukherjee hears the news and in a fight with Lacchman, strangles him to death getting mortally injured in the process. The next morning, surrounded by all his well-wishers, he breathes his last. His dying words are a lament that he could not perform Nani’s eye operation.

The doctor dies, but the good work initiated by him continues. A young doctor, who had earlier tried to assert his superiority to Dr Mukherjee and had been reprimanded by him, now takes on the mantle and carries on the work of ‘people’s doctor’. A doctor’s true role in society is thus firmly established. Today, when the medical profession has become a racket, Hatey Bazarey attains new significance. Dr Mukherjee’s mobile dispensary project is not utopian. It is a realistic and achievable project, founded on sound common sense, a profound understanding of medical science and a heart to live a little for others.

But Hatey Bazarey is not a didactic film. Its enduring appeal does not stem from any social message hidden in the story. The appeal stems from the mythic dimensions of the timeless clash between good and evil.

Hatey Bazarey lobby card (Pic: Priya Films)

If Khaniker Atithi and Hatey Bazarey are about doctors in service of humanity, Ek Doctor Ki Maut (1991) is about a doctor turned scientist. Based on a story titled Abhimanyu by Ramapada Chaudhury and the real-life incident of Dr Subhash Mukhopadhyay’s suicide, Ek Doctor Ki Maut is perhaps the only Indian film that dwells on the challenges of carrying out path-breaking experiments in science.

Dr Dipankar Roy, a doctor at a government hospital, is consumed by his research to discover a leprosy vaccine. He has been carrying on this research at home for the last 10 years. He works before and after office hours and has no institutional support for his work. He is an independent researcher, much like Professor Shanku. He turns one room in his rented apartment into a laboratory. His wife helps him equip this laboratory with an incubator, a fridge and a microscope. His lab is also populated with caged mice that are used to test the leprosy vaccine. The film begins with the sound of mice squeaking.

In the film’s opening scenes, Dr Dipankar Roy is established as self-centred, unsocial and completely absorbed in his work, with no time for pleasantries or small talk. He borrows money from his wife and goes to the office on a crowded bus. His wife takes care of him like a little child, but she is on the verge of losing patience with him. There is nothing in Dr Roy’s character for the audience to warm to him. Audience sympathy is more likely to swing toward his wife Seema, who has been enduring this cantankerous man for ten long years. But Ek Doctor ki Maut is not a family drama. It is about a scientific breakthrough and society’s response to this breakthrough. It is about the rigour of scientific research and the fiercely competitive world of scientific publications.

Pankaj Kapur & Shabana Azmi in EK DOCTOR KI MAUT [Death of A Doctor]

His wife takes care of him like a little child

Through conversations between husband and wife, we get some idea about the ups and downs in the doctor’s research work. Often, he is frustrated by something going wrong when he is on the verge of getting results. He has to repeat his experiments. His hospital duty leaves him with little time for this repetitive, iterative work. He works alone. The only person with whom he can bounce his ideas is Dr Kundu – a retired professor who still engages in active research. Dipankar has many a knotty problem to solve before he can possibly arrive at a result. He cries out in desperation, “So much to do, so little done. Hurry up.”

When Dipankar is busy with his research, his friend and classmate Arijit is busy treating patients and making money. Arijit lives in a big two-storeyed house, his wife wears a long gold chain and he is too busy to take interest in his friend’s research work. However, Arijit’s wife and daughter have a lot of affinity for Dipankar. In Paromita’s eyes, Dipankar is an antithesis to her own husband. She says so at the breakfast table, “Dipankar is made of some other clay. He is different from the likes of you.” That is why Dipankar has carved out a different path for himself. He has found an alternative way of applying his knowledge of medicine and adding to the existing body of knowledge.

Improbable as it may sound, Dipankar does achieve a breakthrough with his skeletal set up. He not only makes the leprosy vaccine, but also discovers its side effect. The vaccine seems to make sterile women fertile. A young journalist Amulya flashes the news in the media. For him, it is a scoop. Little does he realize that all hell would break loose in the medical world of Calcutta. Gynaecologists are up in arms, Dipankar’s superiors in the hospital are irate, and even his friend Arijit is sceptical about Dipankar’s achievement. Junior doctors invite Dipankar for a special lecture only to insult him and try to prove that he is a fraud. He is given a punishment posting to a village hospital; his superior officer suppresses a letter from the John Anderson Foundation. Amidst all these disruptions, Dipankar tries his best to complete writing his paper so he can send it for publication. It is a race against time. His wife Seema tries her best to hold the fort. She keeps up a cheerful front to keep Dipankar’s spirits high.

Irrfan Khan and Pankaj Kapur in EK DOCTOR KE MAUT (Picture Courtesy - Shoma A Chatterji)

A young journalist Amulya flashes the news in the media

One day, hope appears in Dipankar’s new abode in the village, in the form of a scientist from the John Anderson Foundation. She examines Dipankar’s research notes and invites him to her Foundation. But before Dipankar can complete his paper and send it for publication, two scientists from the Massachusetts Institute of Microbiology are credited with inventing the vaccine. Interestingly, they have followed an identical path to Dipankar.

Unlike the real-life doctor Subhash Mukherjee, Dipankar does not commit suicide. He gets an invitation from the John Anderson Foundation to carry out research at their laboratory. The film ends with an aeroplane taking off, heralding a new beginning.

In Ek Doctor Ki Maut, Tapan Sinha masterfully blends human relationships with scientific concepts. Just as he delves deep into the scientific aspects of Dipankar’s research, he dispassionately exposes the ugly side of the medical profession as well as technocracy, without melodrama and without glorifying any one character. The protagonist Dipankar Roy has very few likeable traits. Pankaj Kapoor excelled as the cantankerous scientist, while Shabana Azmi won hearts as his supportive, yet frustrated wife. By not losing faith in her husband and not ceasing to love him, Seema becomes the real hero of the film.

Soumitra Chatterjee in Wheelchair

The doctor is a wheelchair-bound paraplegic

In his fourth film Wheel Chair (1994), the doctor is a wheelchair-bound paraplegic. He runs a centre for paraplegics like him and continues to provide his healing touch to the inmates. The patients are from varied social backgrounds and of varied age groups. Each one has seen better days. The backstory of each inmate brings out the picture of a different era. If the Manoj Mitra character exemplifies the situation in Calcutta during the Second World War, Susmita (Laboni Sarkar) is the victim of lust in Calcutta’s contemporary society. Today, they are all marginalized members of society. Dr Mitra (Soumitra Chatterjee, who gives a unique performance as a paraplegic) gives them new hope. He is a living example of how to live a fulfilling life in a wheelchair. Unfortunately, Wheel Chair did not receive wide viewership or the critical acclaim it deserved.

In all four films discussed, Sinha films doctors in four very different societies, and upholds modern medical science as the foundation of society’s health and well-being. Stylistically, all four films follow the genre of realism. The plots steer clear of coincidences and melodrama. The characters are endowed with agency; they take their destiny into their own hands. Without being didactic, the films impart a strong social message and leave a deep impression in the viewer’s mind.

Click Tapan Sinha@100

for Critiques, Reviews, Interviews

— The Centenary Tribute Series

Creative Writing

Whether you are new or veteran, you are important. Please contribute with your articles on cinema, we are looking forward for an association. Send your writings to amitava@silhouette-magazine.com

Subha Das Mollick is a media teacher and a documentary filmmaker. She has made more than 50 documentary films on a variety of subjects, most of which have been aired on the national television. She had been the head of the Film Studies and Mass Communication Deptt. at the St. Xavier's College, Kolkata.
All Posts of Subha Das Mollick

Hope you enjoyed reading…

… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading and supporting our creative, informative and analytical posts than ever before. And yes, we are firmly set on the path we chose when we started… our twin magazines Learning and Creativity and Silhouette Magazine (LnC-Silhouette) will be accessible to all, across the world.

We are editorially independent, not funded, supported or influenced by investors or agencies. We try to keep our content easily readable in an undisturbed interface, not swamped by advertisements and pop-ups. Our mission is to provide a platform you can call your own creative outlet and everyone from renowned authors and critics to budding bloggers, artists, teen writers and kids love to build their own space here and share with the world.

When readers like you contribute, big or small, it goes directly into funding our initiative. Your support helps us to keep striving towards making our content better. And yes, we need to build on this year after year. Support LnC-Silhouette with a little amount – and it only takes a minute. Thank you

Support LnC-Silhouette

2 thoughts on “The Healing Touch: Doctors in Tapan Sinha’s Films

  • Siddhartha Ghosh

    This essay on films which have doctor as central character makes good reading. Infact I had seen all of them during release. Khaniker Atithi was a story by Tapan Sinha (pen name Nirmal senguta-remembering two friends) The role of doctor operating in a village gave a sublime experience of service to people and the film reflects realism and many visuals depicts role of the doctor under reference. It had a public appeal as well as by those who loved good movies. Even Mrinal Sen expressed that it was his favourite in an interview just after the demise of Tapan Sinha.

    The editing of film is extraordinary and precise. The essay reflects true essence of the film and role of a doctor. “Thus, Khaniker Atithi proves to be a film on nation-building as well as a feminist film.”

    Hatey Bazare is based on story of Bonophool and it depicts the semi rural society where doctor is revered by all except by few evil personalities who defy social norms. Therefore the doctor comes closer to the people
    with high degree of empathy.

    The essay rightly reflects good and bad part of society that exists simultaneously. The analysis of
    Hatey Bazare is based on story of Bonophool and it depicts the semi rural society where doctor is revered by all except by few evil personalities who defy social norms. Therefore the doctor becomes closer to the society with high degree of empathy and also becomes protector of those who are helpless.So he is raised to the ideal level by fulfilling expectations.

    The essay narrates the essence of the story and rightly points out, “Gradually, the doctor becomes the caregiver of his community, attending not only to their physical well-being but also helping to resolve family feuds and other troubles.”

    Ek Doctor ki Maut is a classic in a sense it reflects wonderful craft of film making. The acting dealing with difficult subject matter, and art of story telling creates a lasting impression on the mind of viewers about uncompromising spirit of a doctor, moving away from the incident that comes to mind of a viewer derived from true incident.

    That is the craft of Tapan Sinha’s film that highlights the brighter side of life.

    The analysis is relevant as it highlights –
    “Ek Doctor Ki Maut, Tapan Sinha masterfully blends human relationships with scientific concepts. Just as he delves deep into the scientific aspects of Dipankar’s research, he dispassionately exposes the ugly side of the medical profession as well as technocracy, without melodrama and without glorifying any one character.*”

    The doctor on a wheelchair – is a direct inspiration from the society where one such person exists. I have seen the gentleman on wheel chair during release of the film. It is completely different type of film to make where a bright young girl becomes victim of circumstances when chased by young boys at the staircase with evil motive but she meets with the accident to survive miserably.

    The film encourages all those struggling in life to fight back and reestablish herself by recovering for normal life where will power could do the miracle.

    The essay reflects-
    “So in his fourth film Wheel Chair (1994), the doctor is a wheelchair-bound paraplegic. He runs a centre for paraplegics like him and continues to provide his healing touch to the inmates.” The essay further highlights “The backstory of each inmate brings out the picture of a different era. If the Manoj Mitra character exemplifies the situation in Calcutta during the Second World War, Susmita (Laboni Sarkar) is the victim of lust in Calcutta’s contemporary society. Today, they are all marginalized members of society. Dr Mitra (Soumitra Chatterjee, who gives a unique performance as a paraplegic) gives them new hope. He is a living example of how to live a fulfilling life in a wheelchair.”

    The Wheel Chair is an outstanding work by Tapan Sinha that becomes more relevant today as the evil side of society is reflected now more than before. His vision of social processes and changing times might have promoted him to make a film like this .Here also a triumph of human spirit over evils that affect people The essay very poigently mentioned- “Unfortunately, Wheel Chair did not receive wide viewership or the critical acclaim it deserved.”

    While four award winning movies have been clubbed together for discussion but as I know they have been made according to subject matter that reflects heart of the matter on which film rests, which happened to be handled by a doctor. But there is common factor that each doctor is a professional with a clear vision of service. Therefore, they are relevant to contemporary society. As I know Tapan Sinha well he was never preconditioned to express his views on society or about an idealism.

    Whenever he was affected by serious events in the society he looked for literature or wrote story himself .But all were reality based.

    The analysis in the essay would reflect intrinsic worth of films and introduce viewers about the craft of film making of Tapan Sinha that may kindle interest to know films by Tapan Sinha and above mentioned films in particular.

  • Subha Das Mollick

    Thank you for your detailed comments on my essay. In the process of writing this essay I too got new insights about Tapan Sinha’s craft as well as his worldview.

  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Silhouette Magazine publishes articles, reviews, critiques and interviews and other cinema-related works, artworks, photographs and other publishable material contributed by writers and critics as a friendly gesture. The opinions shared by the writers and critics are their personal opinion and does not reflect the opinion of Silhouette Magazine. Images on Silhouette Magazine are posted for the sole purpose of academic interest and to illuminate the text. The images and screen shots are the copyright of their original owners. Silhouette Magazine strives to provide attribution wherever possible. Images used in the posts have been procured from the contributors themselves, public forums, social networking sites, publicity releases, YouTube, Pixabay and Creative Commons. Please inform us if any of the images used here are copyrighted, we will pull those images down.